5to >3.0 pts
The project's technology use effectively supports and links with curriculum. It affords new possibilities. It projects use of technology directly supports the selceted ISTE Standard.blank
3to >0.0 pts
The project has a tenuous connection to the course curriculum. The technology use somewhat supports the selected ISTE Standard.blank_2
0to >0 pts
The project has no connection to class content or curricular goals and does not support the selected ISTE Standard410491_6592
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent Learning Goals410491_6710
5to >3.0 pts
The project is complete, deep, wellÂscaffolded and adaptable. It offers extensions for more motivated or experienced learners and/or adaptations for students with special needs or learning style preferences.410491_9517
3to >0.0 pts
The project may be complete, but lacks depth. It does not offer strategies or adaptations for students with special needs or learning style preferences.410491_8128
0to >0 pts
The project seems incomplete or poorly conceived. The project’s scope is too large or too small. The teacher has not considered student learning needs.410491_9384
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeacher Role410491_3735
5to >3.0 pts
The teacher is well prepared and has planned an engaging, effective and meaningful lesson. The teacher demonstrates effective problem solving, exploration, creativity, and multiple solutions and effectively facilitates student learning and experiences. The teacher actively Comments Content and curricular connections Learning goals Use of technology Ethical Issues Project Design Role of the Teacher Instructions Assessment Questions What and how did students learn? Include both intentional and unintentional lessons. What did you learn? What would you do differently if you were to do this project again? What were the greatest successes of this project? How would you improve this project? What advise would you give a teacher contemplating a similar project? What kinds of questions did students ask? Where were students most often confused? How did you address the needs of different learners in this project? What resources were most helpful as you planned and implemented this project? tested the necessary hardware and software. tries new or different approaches and asks for help. explores and learns with the students.410491_4605
3to >0.0 pts
The teacher has designed and prepared an appropriate lesson and models good problem solving techniques by trying multiple solutions and incorporating others' ideas. The teacher's role is more of a facilitator than a directive leader.410491_7008
0to >0 pts
The teacher models helpless terror in the face of new technologies and gives up with faced with a problem. The teacher issues directions without encouraging students to understand and explore. The teacher has not planned an effective lesson and has not prepared or tested the necessary hardware and software.410491_5867
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment410491_6167
5to >3.0 pts
The teacher employs multiple and alternative assessment strategies which directly correlate to educational objectives. The assessment strategies are logical, fair, and clearly articulated. Students reflect on their own experiences and learning.410491_9081
3to >0.0 pts
The teacher has planned for assessment but the assessment is inadequate or incomplete, is only formative or only summative, and may not reflect or measure the learning objectives.410491_7567
0to >0 pts
There are no clear plans for formative or summative assessment or the forms of assessment do not match curricular goals.410491_2407
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion