5to >3.0 pts
Presentation is extremely well organized. Presents information in a logical easy to follow format. Flows smoothly from one idea to another.blank
3to >0.0 pts
Presented in a thoughtful manner; there were signs of organization and most transitions were easy to follow, but it times ideas were unclear.blank_2
0to >0 pts
Presentation is choppy and confusing; format is difficult to follow, transitions of ideas were abrupt and distracting.410502_3745
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of project410502_1775
5to >0.0 pts
Accurately and completely describes project; give good information about what was done by the teacher and the students. Shows how project helped to meet selected standard.410502_4041
0to >0 pts
Does not describe Project well; gives no reasoning for project or describe how project help to meet standard.410502_2157
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreativity410502_7617
5to >0.0 pts
Participant defines the audience for the presentation and describes how presentation was shared with others. Presentation explains that sharing.410502_5689
0to >0 pts
No evidence of sharing the presentation with an audience outside of the course.410502_7072
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
/
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion